Phoebus is presently a lizard man but certainly has not been this all of his career. Originally a fighter, Phoebus rose to 10th level before he was slain. A cleric being unavailable, a druid was prevailed upon to perform a reincarnation. Phoebus returned in the body of a lizard man.
The mere fact that a Player Character would have to deal with a little unforeseen adversity would have ended an entire campaign. I can barely believe I am typing it, but it is true. It’s not simply that the so offended player would have quit. No, we could have at least continued playing around that bit of childishness. More often than not, the player would instead continue playing and either insist on writing up a new character, or rarely continue with the altered character. What was more certain however was that the player would do everything in their power to sabotage the campaign including, but not limited to, influencing the other players behind my back to abandon the campaign.
Case in point; the story of Faelel Eveningfall. Faelel was a male Moon Elf Bard of the Forgotten Realms. The campaign started in Silverymoon, but soon moved to the besieged city of Nesmé. Faelel while fighting with a pair of wererats in the city’s sewers was infected with lycanthropy (possible in v3.5 D&D) and eventually had his first night as a wererat.
The player was not happy. The player decided that Faelel would embark on a suicide mission to escape the siege by hobgoblins, bugbears, and giants to try to reach Silverymoon and bring reinforcements. This was an effort doomed to fail, but the player was seemingly shocked when Faelel’s horse was crushed with a boulder, and Faelel himself knocked unconscious and taken captive.
I had planned to allow for Faelel’s rescue the very next adventure as the adventurers stormed a hidden hobgoblin outpost. The player would have none of it. He instead wrote up a Cavalier who insisted on trying to take his warhorse into every dungeon the adventurers entered. I had great campaign plans for Faelel. Part of the campaign eventually would take the adventurers to Waterdeep, where a devious plot was underfoot by the People of the Black Blood. They were actually in league with Gerti Orelsdottr, and Faelel would have been in a perfect position to infiltrate the organization due to his lycanthropy and not only foil the plot, but also gain critical insight into the plans of the frost giantess herself.
None of that was ever to be. Due to the Cavalier’s insistence on attempting to get his horse into each and every dungeon the adventurers assaulted, and a growing dissatisfaction with the campaign (that I later learned was due to repeated relentless attempts on the part of the offended player to sway the rest of the group against my story) it ended before the adventurers were able to recover a weapon of great importance that would have allowed them to not only slay the frost giantess, but also her fiendish white dragon Rynnarvyx.
And that wasn’t the only, first or last time something along those lines happened. That I put up with it for so long is proof that I am either the most patient person on the planet, or that I am certifiably insane.
So apart from getting that story off my chest, what is the point of all that exposition? Well, it serves to illustrate a disturbing trend that I think has been going on in gaming, and especially Dungeons & Dragons for a long time. Certainly since Wizards of the Coast took over the brand in 1997. I am at a loss to remember instances of this before then, but in 1997 the internet wasn’t what it is now in regard to exchanges of competing ideas. Certainly since then I have noticed a trend on the message boards where players will put up with no deviation from their original character concept and build. I find myself asking, what happened. In 1st Edition, and even for most of 2nd Edition Advanced Dungeons & Dragons (and for what little we played of B/X Dungeons & Dragons) such adversity, while not sought out, seemed to be at least accepted when it did occur. We had characters that lost levels to undead. We had thieves that died due to a failed poison save. We had dead Player Characters raised as zombies, so the adventurers could at least get their body and equipment out of a dungeon so they could be given a proper burial (at age 14 the logic of that seemed irrefutable, but now I don’t think that is necessarily a good act). We had characters that turned on the party to become enemies. We had enemies that could be shown the error of their ways. We had characters that were polymorphed into all sorts of creatures. We had characters that were eaten by all sorts of creatures (an
encounter with carrion crawlers springs to mind). And through all of that and more, we never rage quit. We played adversity to the hilt and sometimes took it even one step further. Adversity was looked at as an opportunity to show what you were made of as a role player. It was seen as an opportunity to truly shine, even if only for a short time one tried to burn (in the words of Eldon Tyrell) “so very, very brightly”.
I have often said that I think drama occurs when characters fail. This is true in all kinds of fiction and is perhaps doubly true in role playing games. If characters always win, always succeed, and always do so with panache I think a great opportunity is missed. If when a character fails, a player or Dungeon Master does not leap to the ready, prepared to make the best of a bad situation, then the player or DM has also failed.
Pheobus’ story doesn’t end with the quote above. It goes on…
At some point since 591 CY, Phoebus traveled to Irongate and discovered the portal to the World Serpent Inn. Enjoying the relative anonymity of a place where he rubbed shoulders with beings as varied as efreet and githyanki, he decided to stay. He now works as a bodyguard there. For once, he no longer has to worry about being treated as a freak.